Monday, July 30, 2007
Every step counts!
We are all a part of the congestion problem!
There has been a lot of buzz around ‘congestion pricing.’ This is a policy being implemented which charges vehicles entering highly congestion areas such as downtown cores during certain times of the day. The most famous case is that in Britain. I found this article quite interesting because it gives a very local perspective on the topic. Many people believe that since they live in the city, they are not a part of the congestion problem but this is not the case. This article paints a very real picture of the daily challenges of the congestion problem. http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/city/2007/07/18/98238b54-d8e1-4e4f-813d-db1ca62dbef6.lpf |
Around and Around...
The big thing now in transportation is to find ways to relieve traffic congestion. There is talk about this everywhere and of course extensive research. I stumbled upon this one particular article from Springfield Missouri about fining commuter for passing the same location within a certain time frame more than once. This “no cruising” policy is to help relieve congestion within downtown Springfield but is not without criticism. The city claims that traffic counts conducted showed cursing to be a problem in the area. However, commuters are complaining that you could go past the same point just looking for a parking spot! I wonder if something like this no cruising policy would actually be effective. I don’t really see this being implemented in Vancouver though. The logic seems a bit flawed. Planners and engineers should be focused on keeping vehicles out of the core rather than penalizing those who are already in! http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070718/NEWS01/707180358/1007/NEWS01 |
Sunday, July 29, 2007
Williams Lake and its four-way stops
Kelowna and its highways
Kamloops Office
Random thoughts!
In June, I went on this big trip out to the other three offices my company owns. One in Kamloops, Kelowna and Williams Lake. I thought this would be the perfect opportunity to see how other cities outside of the GVRD are mapped out. I had wrote a few blog entries along the way in a journal and took an insane amount of pictures. Since I am in transportation planning, I tend to find myself in many conversations with people about roads and traffic. People have a lot to say on the topic for anyone who wants to listen and luckily I am one of those people. It took a while but I finally but all my random scribbling together in the next few entries. I hope you enjoy them...! |
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
All in a name

"The terms may frequently apply to exactly the same thing. However, 'road' is a general term, whereas 'street' is narrower in sense and chiefly urban in application: a street typically has buildings on either side, and is paved or metalled. "
You call THIS a highway?!

"What do you mean?", I asked, " surely the highways here can't be that different."
He went on to explain that during there first week here, his wife was called in for an interview in Surrey. He mapped out the route they would need to take get to the interview location but ran into a lot of trouble. On the map it showed Highway 99A as the most direct route and being an American, he thought that a highway would be the fasted way to go. However, he soon discovered that highways in Canada are not the same as they are in the States.
Highway 99A is actually called King George Highway which is more of a major road than a highway as there is a traffic light every few blocks and is usually highly congested. His wife was late for the interview thanks to this misunderstanding in reading the map.
Highways in Canada are not the massive transportation passages they are in the States. Here we are a little more loose with our "highway" labelling but we do have the best scenery!
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Poor Mall!

Suburban Shame

On a recent site visit to one of our projects, my boss and I got into quite an interesting discussion on why he HATES the suburbs!! I was shocked to say the least but he had some valid points. He told me that when he use to live in Seattle, he lived exactly a mile from work. But thanks to the way the city was designed he had no choice but to DRIVE to work.
"I lived in the suburbs only once in my entire life. My home was one exit away from my work but there was no pedestrian crossings or safe path that I could take to get to my office. If I wanted to walk, I would need to take a detour 5 miles even though I lived only a mile away! My time is very valuable, I don't want to waste it sitting in traffic."
My boss and his family now live in downtown where they can walk or take transit to any location they need go daily. They are involved in the ZIP car program (vehicle-sharing) so they have a vehicle whenever they need it, which is not very often. He claims that not only is his quality of life better (more time to spend with his wife and son) but he's healthier now because of all the exercise he is getting.
Many would claim that downtown streets are not entirely pedestrian friendly but the suburbs are worse. Sure we may have wide new sidewalks but when do we actually use them to make a walking trip? The atmosphere in the suburbs is not endusive to non-automobile trips, everything is just too far from each other!
So sure I might have a nice yard but all the time I might have spent in it is now lost in commuting everywhere. What a shame....!
Friday, June 8, 2007
The Numbered Grid

I love Surrey for they way they have systematically developed their road network. (See the map image to the left) Although we have a few named streets, the avenues and streets for the most part are numbered so that its one big beautiful grid. This is a good thing right?
Maybe not... the numbered roads are great for directions and navigation but it completely takes away something from the city. "120 Street is the shady part of town" sounds odd when we are use to hearing "Hastings Street is the shady part of town." Its not just the fact Hastings Street is more heard of but the actual name gives it some 'substance' and history. The name itself evokes some feelings... numbers do not.
Does a numbered grid take away value and character from the city?
Friday, June 1, 2007
Introduction: "What its all about"
This whole topic started with a few innocent questions from a friend of mine. He asked me if I preferred the roads in Surrey (generally a suburb area) to the ones in Vancouver.
"Of course Surrey has the better roads," I answered. "Not only do they have designated left turn signals, wider curb space but now there are also designated right turn lanes for large developments."
My friend nodded in agreement. "Sure, Surrey does have all those things and the roads feel easier to drive on but there is no sense of community when you drive in Surrey. Everything has a specific space and everyone always wants to drive on the main roads. In Vancouver, everyone drives everywhere. When you drive in Vancouver, you know you are going through different neighbourhoods and communities because there are shops, parks and schools scattered everywhere. I don't feel that in Surrey, its too planned… too well thought out."
Now as an engineering student, I almost took offense to his comment but I realized that there needs to be more to a road network than its ability to move traffic. Now this maybe more of a zoning and planning issue but I want to explore how the road networks in the GVRD have shaped this region. How would a highway through downtown Vancouver change the GVRD of today? How is the Pitt River Bridge and the twinning of the Port Mann going to effect the sprawling communities? Are things getting better or worse?
Keep your eyes on the road because its going to be one interesting journey!